Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP Claim
HomeClaim GuideDisputesContact
LanguageEN
English简体中文繁體中文日本語한국어
More
About UsCompensation GuideAccident TypesPICSerious InjuriesAMA4 & WPICase LawResourcesFAQFree Review
Scarring and skin impairment
LanguageEN
English简体中文繁體中文日本語한국어

Skin, scarring and permanent impairment in NSW CTP claims

Scars and skin injuries after a motor accident can affect movement, sensation, pain, temperature tolerance, treatment needs, social function and appearance. The WPI question needs careful evidence.

Quick answer

Skin and scarring WPI is not just cosmetic. AMA4 Chapter 13 focuses on actual functional loss, while appearance, disfigurement, photographs, dimensions, texture, ulceration, adherence and daily activity impact may also matter.

Respectful scar management and rehabilitation review with blank treatment documents in a clinical room.
Skin and scarring impairment focuses on function first, with appearance and disfigurement considered where relevant.

What this means in a NSW CTP claim

Function comes first

Skin impairment assessment considers how the injury affects daily activities and employment-related function. Restricted movement, fragile skin, ulceration, altered sensation, heat intolerance and treatment needs can all matter.

Scars should be described properly

A useful report should describe the scar location, size, shape, colour, elevation or depression, texture, adherence, tenderness, ulceration and whether treatment or surgery may change the outcome.

Appearance can still be relevant

Disfigurement may have functional or behavioural consequences, especially where visible scarring changes social participation, clothing choices or self-care. The report should avoid dismissing appearance without analysis.

Other systems may also need assessment

Burns and scarring can overlap with nerve, joint, respiratory or psychological issues. Those issues should be assessed by the correct method and combined only where allowed.

Why photographs alone are not enough

Photographs can help show appearance and location, but a skin impairment opinion should not stop there. The assessment should explain whether the scar is painful, fragile, adherent, raised, depressed, ulcerated, heat-sensitive, movement-limiting or likely to need further treatment. It should also record whether the person avoids sun, clothing pressure, work tasks, sport, swimming or social activities because of the scarring. That functional context is important because the NSW CTP question is permanent impairment and practical impact, not simply whether a mark is visible.

When scarring overlaps with other injuries

A scar may be only one part of the permanent impairment picture. A burn can also cause joint stiffness, nerve sensitivity, psychological symptoms or ongoing treatment needs. Surgical scars may sit over an orthopaedic injury that has its own method of assessment. The report should keep those problems separate first, then explain any allowed combination step.

Evidence that usually matters

Scar details
Measurements, location, colour, texture, elevation, adherence, ulceration and photographs where appropriate.
Function
Movement restriction, skin breakdown, sensory change, heat intolerance, treatment needs and daily activity impact.
Treatment course
Burns care, grafts, compression, revision surgery, laser therapy, desensitisation or occupational therapy records.
Related systems
Joint stiffness, nerve symptoms, respiratory issues or psychological effects assessed separately if relevant.

Common traps

  • - Do not treat every scar as only cosmetic.
  • - Do not rate appearance without recording functional and behavioural impact.
  • - Do not ignore future treatment that may change stability.
  • - Do not double count the same limitation under two methods.

Practical next steps

  1. 1. Photograph and measure scars in a clinically respectful way.
  2. 2. Record how the scar affects clothing, movement, sleep, work, heat, touch or self-care.
  3. 3. Collect burn clinic, plastic surgery and therapy records.
  4. 4. Check whether the WPI report explains Chapter 13 reasoning.
  5. 5. If scarring is visible or functionally limiting, make sure the report actually addresses it.

Frequently asked questions

Can scarring count for WPI?

Yes, where the relevant method supports impairment. The issue is usually the functional impact, appearance/disfigurement context and quality of evidence.

Are photos useful?

They can be useful if taken respectfully and paired with measurements, location and clinical explanation.

Can scarring be assessed with joint restriction?

Sometimes related impairments may need separate methods, but the report must avoid double counting and follow the combination rules.