Discontinuing PIC proceedings
Can I withdraw a PIC application after it has been lodged?
An applicant may discontinue all or part of the proceeding before final determination
Rule 76 of the Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021 allows an applicant to discontinue applicable proceedings, or part of them, against one or all other parties at any time before final determination. Use the Commission process and identify exactly what is being discontinued. A PIC discontinuance does not by itself reverse the insurer decision, settle the CTP claim, preserve a statutory deadline or guarantee that the same dispute can be lodged again. Check unresolved benefits, future treatment, limitation periods, evidence, costs and any settlement terms before acting.
A claimant may want to withdraw because the insurer changes its decision, the parties settle an issue, evidence is incomplete, the wrong PIC stream was used, the burden of the process is high or legal advice changes the strategy. Those reasons have different consequences. Sometimes a consent order, amendment, deferral or partial discontinuance deals with the problem more accurately than ending everything.
PIC proceedings are also separate from an internal review, the underlying statutory-benefits claim and a common law damages claim. Closing one application does not necessarily close those other matters. Equally, a signed damages release can give up rights far beyond the PIC issue and should never be treated as routine withdrawal paperwork.
Reviewed by Herman Chan, Stephen Young Lawyers

What exactly can be discontinued?
Rule 76 permits discontinuance of all or part of applicable proceedings and against one or all other parties. The notice should identify the PIC case number, application type, disputed decision, parties and whether the whole proceeding or only a defined issue is ending. Ambiguous wording such as “withdraw my claim” can create unnecessary uncertainty.
If the insurer has accepted the result sought, ask for a written decision or agreement showing what will change and when. A discontinuance without that record may leave the original insurer decision operative. If the parties agree on the determination of a dispute, Rule 71 consent-order procedure may be more suitable in some proceedings.
If the problem is a wrong factual detail or omitted issue, consider whether amendment is available under the Rules. If the evidence is temporarily incomplete, ask whether a direction, deferral or stood-over process is available. None of these alternatives is automatic, but they should be assessed before abandoning the case.
What consequences should be checked first?
Identify the status of weekly payments, treatment, threshold injury, permanent impairment, liability and damages. The withdrawn PIC proceeding may concern only one of those issues. Ask whether the insurer decision will continue, whether payments are already affected and whether another live review or application depends on the result.
Check time. Rule 76 gives a procedural right to discontinue before determination; it does not say that the original statutory application period is reset. A later application may face a time objection, jurisdiction issue, estoppel argument, changed evidence or an insurer position that the matter was finally resolved. Do not promise yourself a simple reopening.
Check money and documents. Discontinuance does not automatically create compensation, require the insurer to pay legal costs or erase material already lodged. Professional fees, disbursements and any regulated recovery from the insurer depend on the dispute, legislation, outcome and written costs agreement.
How should the withdrawal be recorded?
Use the current approved Commission process or directions for the proceeding. Notify the Commission and every other party, state the precise extent of discontinuance and request written confirmation that the file or issue has been closed. Do not contact the allocated decision-maker privately; correspondence should go through Pathway or the Registry and include the other parties.
If the withdrawal follows a settlement or changed insurer decision, attach or refer to the operative document without disclosing privileged settlement communications unnecessarily. Confirm any payment date, treatment approval period, recalculation and costs term separately. “Without prejudice” correspondence is not itself the final enforceable record.
Keep the sealed application, discontinuance record, insurer response and final Commission notification. Those documents may later be needed to explain what was and was not determined.
Practical next steps
Check a proposed PIC withdrawal
Define the scope and consequences before sending the notice.
Map every live issue
List the PIC application, insurer decision, benefits, damages and any other review.
Identify why the case is stopping
Record settlement, changed decision, wrong stream, evidence gap or another reason.
Assess alternatives
Consider amendment, consent orders, partial discontinuance, deferral or further directions.
Check time and costs
Do not assume refiling, costs recovery or future rights are preserved.
File precise notice
Use the Commission process, notify all parties and keep written confirmation.
Evidence
Withdrawal review checklist
Make the decision from the full procedural record.
- Sealed PIC application, reply and case number.
- Original and internal-review insurer decisions.
- Current Commission directions and listing notices.
- Any written settlement or changed insurer decision.
- Payment, treatment and claim-status schedules.
- Legal costs agreement and disbursement record.
- Advice about time limits and future applications.
- Proposed discontinuance wording.
Do not confuse discontinuance with final resolution
- Do not write “withdraw my whole CTP claim” when only one PIC issue is ending.
- Do not assume discontinuance reverses the insurer decision.
- Do not assume the same application can be refiled later without a time or jurisdiction issue.
- Do not sign a damages release as if it were an administrative PIC form.
- Do not rely on an oral settlement without recording the operative terms.
Timing
Rule 76 does not restart statutory time
Discontinuance is available before final determination, but future rights depend on other law.
- An applicant may discontinue before the proceeding is finally determined.
- Comply with any current direction or listing until the Commission confirms otherwise.
- Check the original review or application period before assuming a later filing remains possible.
- If settlement triggered the withdrawal, record payment and performance dates separately.
Frequently asked questions
- Do I need the insurer’s consent to discontinue?
- Rule 76 states that an applicant may discontinue before final determination. Use the required Commission process and notify the parties; separate settlement or consent-order terms may still matter.
- Can I withdraw only one issue?
- Rule 76 permits discontinuance of part of applicable proceedings. The notice must define the issue precisely.
- Will the insurer decision disappear?
- Not merely because the PIC application is discontinued. Obtain a changed decision, agreement or order if that is part of the resolution.
- Can I lodge again later?
- Do not assume so. The original statutory period, type of dispute, reason for discontinuance and any settlement or prior determination must be checked.
- Does the insurer pay my legal costs after withdrawal?
- Not automatically. Recovery depends on statutory permission, the dispute, reasonableness, outcome or assessment and the costs agreement.
- Is changing lawyers the same as withdrawing?
- No. Representation can change while the PIC application continues, but the Commission and other parties must be notified under Rule 60.
Related NSW CTP and PIC guides
Official sources
- Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (NSW), current in-force version
- Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021 (NSW), current in-force version
- Personal Injury Commission Procedural Direction PIC1: conduct of parties during proceedings
- Personal Injury Commission Procedural Direction MA7: claims disputes
- Personal Injury Commission Procedural Direction PIC16: self-represented litigants
This page uses the current Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, Personal Injury Commission Act 2020, Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021, Motor Accident Guidelines version 10.1 and current PIC procedural directions. The correct procedure depends on the dispute stream, the notice issued in the individual proceeding and any direction made by the Commission.
Before discontinuing
Are you considering withdrawing a PIC application?
Send the application, decisions, current directions and proposed terms. We can identify the scope, alternatives and consequences before the notice is filed.
General information only: This page provides general NSW CTP procedural information, not legal advice. It does not create or extend a deadline, guarantee that the Commission will accept evidence or a request, or predict the result of a dispute.