Delayed insurer internal review
What can I do if the insurer has not completed its internal review on time?
Work out the due date, preserve proof and move to the correct PIC process if available
A NSW CTP internal review is generally due within 14 days, but the Motor Accident Guidelines allow 21 days for specified medical and fault matters and 14 days after relevant new information is provided. The overall period must not exceed 28 days after the review request. If the insurer has not completed the review by the applicable date, ask for written confirmation of the request date and status, keep proof of lodgement and check the correct Personal Injury Commission (PIC) stream. For a merit review, Guidelines clause 7.34 expressly measures the 28-day PIC period from the date the insurer was required to complete an overdue review. Other dispute types have different commencement rules, so do not use that rule indiscriminately.
An insurer delay should be treated as a procedural fact, not as an automatic win on the underlying dispute. The Commission will still need the original decision, the issue in dispute, the result sought and relevant evidence. The practical advantage of identifying the missed date is that a claimant may no longer have to wait for an internal-review certificate before taking the next available step.
Start with the exact dispute. PAWE and many weekly-payment questions are merit review matters. Treatment, causation, threshold injury and permanent impairment are medical assessment matters. Fault, mostly-at-fault and some other statutory-benefit decisions are miscellaneous claims assessment matters. The application, evidence and time rules are not interchangeable.
Reviewed by Herman Chan, Stephen Young Lawyers

How is the internal-review due date calculated?
The Guidelines require the insurer to acknowledge an internal-review request within two business days. If it accepts the review, it should identify the issues, reviewer, further information and due date as soon as practicable and within seven days. The internal reviewer must be independent of the original decision in the way specified by clause 7.15.
Clause 7.24 sets a general 14-day notification period. Table 7.1 gives 21 days for specified permanent impairment, threshold injury, fault, mostly-at-fault, serious driving offence and contributory-negligence matters. If the claimant provides relevant new information after requesting review, the period can be 14 days after that material is provided. Clause 7.26 caps the total period at 28 days from the request.
Use calendar dates and retain the document that triggered each date. Record when the insurer received the request, whether it requested further material, when that material was supplied and the date stated in its acknowledgement. An informal phone call that does not identify the decision, alternative result and reasons may create an argument about whether a valid review request was made.
What should the claimant do when the date passes?
Send a short written status request. Attach the original review request and delivery proof, state the calculated due date and ask whether a decision has been issued. Do not repeatedly send argumentative emails or continually restart the evidence bundle. The purpose is to establish the record and obtain any missing certificate or reasons.
Prepare the PIC material at the same time: original decision, review request, acknowledgement, chronology, evidence and a clear statement of the alternative decision sought. If weekly payments or treatment are being affected, also keep the current payment schedule, Certificates of Fitness and treatment requests. Delay in the review does not remove the need to prove the substantive issue.
A SIRA complaint may address administration or insurer conduct, but it is not a substitute for a statutory PIC application that determines the disputed decision. Choose the route by the legal issue, not by which organisation answered first.
When can the dispute move to the PIC?
For merit review, Guidelines clause 7.34 says that where internal review was required but not completed on time, the PIC application period runs for 28 days after the date the insurer was required to complete the review. That is a specific rule for merit review; it should not be presented as the deadline for every medical or miscellaneous dispute.
The current PIC Rules permit a medical assessment application about an insurer decision as soon as practicable after the internal-review outcome, a refusal to conduct review, or the date by which the insurer should have completed it. A claims assessment or miscellaneous application follows the Act, Rules, approved form and MA7. Check the classification before lodging, because the wrong stream can delay the case and fail to answer the insurer decision.
If the insurer issues the review while the application is being prepared, use the review certificate and reasons. If a PIC matter has already been lodged, provide the new decision through the Commission process and comply with directions about amendment or additional documents rather than emailing the decision-maker directly.
Practical next steps
Respond to an overdue internal review
Keep the timing record separate from the merits of the dispute.
Confirm a valid request
Keep the request, original decision and proof showing when the insurer received it.
Calculate the applicable period
Check the 14-day rule, Table 7.1, later new information and the 28-day maximum.
Request written status
Ask for the review certificate, reasons and relied-on documents without restarting the request.
Classify the dispute
Identify merit review, medical assessment or miscellaneous claims assessment.
Protect the next step
Prepare and lodge through the correct PIC process within the applicable period.
Evidence
Overdue-review document checklist
The dates must be provable from documents, not reconstructed from memory.
- The original insurer decision and date received.
- The internal-review request and every attachment.
- Email receipt, portal confirmation or delivery record.
- The insurer acknowledgement and stated due date.
- Requests for additional information and the response date.
- Any review certificate or later reasons received.
- A chronology of calls and written follow-up.
- Substantive medical, wage, treatment or accident evidence for the dispute.
Common mistakes after insurer delay
- Do not assume silence means the original decision has been reversed.
- Do not apply the merit-review 28-day rule to every PIC dispute.
- Do not keep waiting indefinitely for a certificate after the maximum review period.
- Do not use a SIRA complaint as a replacement for a PIC application.
- Do not send new material without recording when and why it was supplied.
Timing
The review delay can start the next time period
Calculate from the actual request and dispute type.
- Internal review is generally requested within 28 days of receiving the insurer decision.
- The review result is generally due in 14 days, subject to Table 7.1 and the 28-day overall maximum.
- For merit review, an overdue internal review can trigger a 28-day PIC application period under Guidelines clause 7.34.
- Medical and miscellaneous matters use their own Act, Rules and procedural requirements; act as soon as practicable.
Frequently asked questions
- Does an overdue review mean I automatically win?
- No. It may allow the next dispute step, but the underlying decision still has to be addressed with law and evidence.
- Can the insurer take 21 days?
- Yes for the specified medical and fault-related matters in Guidelines Table 7.1. The actual classification must be checked.
- Can new evidence extend the review?
- Relevant new information supplied after the request can change the notification period, but the total period must not exceed 28 days after the request.
- Should I lodge a complaint first?
- A complaint may address service or conduct. It does not replace the PIC process that can determine a reviewable decision.
- What if the insurer says it never received the request?
- Provide the email, portal or delivery record and the complete request. Whether a valid request was made may need to be addressed expressly.
- What if the review arrives after I lodge at PIC?
- Give it to the Commission and other party through the required process and follow directions about any amendment or additional documents.
Related NSW CTP and PIC guides
Official sources
- Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW), current in-force version
- SIRA Motor Accident Guidelines, current published version
- Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021 (NSW), current in-force version
- Personal Injury Commission: merit review disputes
- Personal Injury Commission Procedural Direction MA2: merit review
This page uses the current Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, Personal Injury Commission Act 2020, Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021, Motor Accident Guidelines version 10.1 and current PIC procedural directions. The correct procedure depends on the dispute stream, the notice issued in the individual proceeding and any direction made by the Commission.
Overdue review check
Has the insurer missed the internal-review date?
Send the original decision, review request, acknowledgement and any later correspondence. We can identify the due date, dispute stream and next available step.
General information only: This page provides general NSW CTP procedural information, not legal advice. It does not create or extend a deadline, guarantee that the Commission will accept evidence or a request, or predict the result of a dispute.