Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP

Nerve-root dysfunction

Radiculopathy after a NSW motor accident

Radiculopathy is not another word for pain running down an arm or leg. Under the current Motor Accident Guidelines it means impairment caused by dysfunction of a spinal nerve root, supported by two or more specified clinical signs found on examination.

Spinal nerve-root and neurological examination evidence for a NSW CTP radiculopathy claim.
A radiculopathy diagnosis should line up the root level, two or more clinical signs and any supporting imaging.

Motor accident mechanism

What can happen in a motor accident?

Rear-end crash

A cervical or lumbar disc may become symptomatic after sudden loading, but nerve-root dysfunction still requires clinical verification.

Side-impact crash

Rotation and lateral loading may produce unilateral foraminal or disc symptoms that must be mapped to the affected root.

Motorcycle fall

Compression, traction or direct impact can affect a nerve root, disc or foraminal structures.

Pedestrian impact

Direct trauma and a fall can cause disc, fracture or nerve-root injury with different neurological patterns.

Injuries and diagnoses that may follow

  • cervical radiculopathy
  • lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy
  • disc-related nerve-root compression
  • foraminal narrowing with nerve-root dysfunction
  • post-fracture or post-operative radiculopathy

Symptoms that should be recorded accurately

  • shooting or burning arm or leg pain
  • pins and needles
  • numbness in a dermatomal distribution
  • focal myotomal weakness
  • reduced grip, walking or lifting function depending on the root

Urgent medical signs

Rapidly progressive weakness, foot drop, gait change or bladder/bowel symptoms requires urgent medical assessment.

Clinical evidence

What medical findings matter?

The diagnosis should identify the root, side and signs. Table 6.8 defines how atrophy, reflex asymmetry, SLR, weakness and sensory loss are verified.

Record or testWhat it can establishWhat it cannot establish alone
Reflex testingRepeated marked asymmetry between involved and normal limbs can provide one qualifying sign.A vague note that reflexes are reduced, without side-to-side comparison, may be insufficient.
SLR or nerve-tension testA positive lumbosacral test reproduces thigh or leg pain in the appropriate dermatomal distribution.Back pain or hamstring tightness is not positive SLR for this purpose.
Circumference measurementTable 6.8 uses at least 2 cm in the thigh or 1 cm in the arm, forearm or calf, measured at identical levels.Visual impression of wasting without reproducible measurement may not establish atrophy.
Power and sensory testingMust be reproducible and anatomically localised to the affected root.Global weakness caused by pain inhibition is excluded by clause 6.141.
MRI and EMG/NCSMay support the root level and alternative diagnosis.Imaging and electrodiagnostic tests cannot establish radiculopathy alone; clause 6.142 says EMG is rarely necessary and not solely diagnostic.

Part 5 classification

Is this likely to be threshold or non-threshold?

For a neck or spine injury, radiculopathy is essential to deciding whether neurological symptoms take the injury beyond soft tissue. If fewer than two qualifying signs are established, clause 5.9 says the injury is assessed as threshold, even if pain radiates in a nerve-like pattern.

Evidence that may support a threshold classification

  • radiating pain with no objective signs
  • only one qualifying sign
  • global weakness from pain
  • sensory complaints that cannot be reproduced anatomically

Evidence that may support a non-threshold injury

  • two or more qualifying signs in one anatomically coherent root pattern
  • a consistent accident mechanism and symptom chronology
  • supporting imaging that matches, but does not replace, the signs
  • specialist reasoning excluding competing peripheral or central causes

Radiculopathy means two or more clinical signs, not pain alone

Clauses 5.7-5.9 and 6.138-6.142 require dysfunction of a spinal nerve root with two or more of the following signs found on examination:

  1. 1.loss or asymmetry of reflexes
  2. 2.positive sciatic nerve-root tension signs
  3. 3.muscle atrophy or decreased limb circumference
  4. 4.muscle weakness anatomically localised to the appropriate spinal nerve-root distribution
  5. 5.reproducible sensory loss anatomically localised to the appropriate spinal nerve-root distribution

Pain, burning or tingling that follows a nerve-root pattern but lacks objective neurological findings is a non-verifiable radicular complaint under Table 6.8. If the neck or spine symptoms do not meet the radiculopathy criteria, clause 5.9 says the injury is assessed as threshold.

Part 6 permanent impairment

How is WPI assessed for this injury?

Verified radiculopathy is a DRE III differentiator in Table 6.7. More serious structural patterns can fall in DRE IV or V under the applicable descriptors. The category must be based on the complete assessment, not simply the threshold decision.

CTP spine method: clause 6.111 requires the DRE method. The spinal ROM model and AMA4 Table 75 are not used, and clause 6.123 says loss of motion segment integrity is not applied.

CategoryHuman-language guide to the verified CTP rule
DRE ISymptoms are present, but the medical assessor finds no objective clinical findings that place the injury in a higher category. This is the rule stated in clause 6.129.
DRE IIThe assessor finds qualifying clinical findings, such as guarding, reproducible non-uniform motion or non-verifiable radicular complaints, or a specified stable fracture pattern, but not verified radiculopathy or a higher structural inclusion.
DRE IIIThis category includes verified radiculopathy and specified fracture or dislocation patterns identified in Table 6.7. Radiating pain without the required neurological signs is not enough.
DRE IVThis is a higher structural category. One verified example is multiple qualifying vertebral fractures without radiculopathy under clause 6.151(a). Fusion and disc replacement are treated as multilevel structural compromise under clause 6.145, but surgery does not by itself supply a fixed percentage.
DRE VThis is the higher structural category where the applicable descriptor includes radiculopathy. Clause 6.151(b), for example, places multiple qualifying vertebral fractures with radiculopathy in category V.

A DRE category is not a percentage to calculate from symptoms. The assessor must use the region-specific AMA4 descriptors on pages 102-107 as modified by clauses 6.125-6.132 and explain the tables or figures used, as required by clause 6.122.

  • Two signs must be found on examination for the radiculopathy conclusion.
  • C2/C3 sensory loss has the special clause 6.139 method.
  • EMG/NCS is not a substitute for clinical signs.
  • Separate spinal regions may be combined; findings within one region are not added.

What does not establish the result by itself?

  • shooting pain, burning or tingling alone
  • one sign alone
  • global pain-limited weakness
  • MRI nerve contact alone
  • EMG result alone

Accident-specific examples

Arm pain plus MRI foraminal narrowing

Without two clinical signs, this remains a non-verifiable radicular complaint for the Part 5 test despite the scan.

S1 symptoms with absent ankle reflex and positive dermatomal SLR

These may be two qualifying signs if repeatedly verified and anatomically consistent.

Leg weakness recorded only as 4/5 globally because of pain

Clause 6.141 says global weakness related to pain or inhibition is not weakness from spinal nerve malfunction.

Claim file preparation

Evidence checklist

root-specific symptom map
repeated reflex findings
SLR angle and reproduced distribution
tape measurements at identical limb levels
myotomal power and dermatomal sensation findings
matching MRI level
specialist differential diagnosis
serial function and work-capacity records

Practical next steps

What should you do next with a radiculopathy claim?

Start with the insurer's most recent written decision and identify what is actually disputed: treatment, weekly payments or work capacity, threshold injury, permanent impairment, causation, or damages. These are separate questions and may require different evidence and review procedures. Record the date of the decision and every review deadline shown before gathering further material.

  1. 01

    Preserve the claim and the decision under review

    Keep the claim number, accident date, insurer letter, certificate of fitness and any internal review or Personal Injury Commission correspondence together. Do not assume that a treatment approval or payment of statutory benefits decides fault, damages eligibility or WPI.

  2. 02

    Obtain evidence that answers the disputed issue

    For this injury, the useful starting material includes root-specific symptom map and repeated reflex findings. Clinical testing may include Reflex testing and SLR or nerve-tension test. Ask the treating practitioner to record the diagnosis, accident causation, objective findings, treatment response and current functional limits rather than symptoms alone.

  3. 03

    Use the correct review process

    Compare the insurer's reasons with the records it relied on. A threshold-injury decision, treatment refusal, weekly-payment decision and WPI assessment do not all follow the same review process. The decision letter should identify available internal review or dispute steps and the applicable deadline.

If the decision, medical material or deadline is unclear, send the key documents for a focused review before lodging a broad objection. See the CTP disputes guide or contact NSW CTP Claim. Advice depends on the facts, evidence and current law; a review cannot guarantee a claim outcome.

Assessment source

Radiculopathy threshold and DRE source

Assessment source: Motor Accident Guidelines v10.1 clauses 5.7-5.9 and 6.138-6.142; Table 6.8 definitions; Table 6.7 DRE categories; AMA4 Chapter 3.3 only as modified by Part 6.

Threshold injury: Two or more specified clinical signs are required. If the neurological symptoms do not meet the radiculopathy criteria, clause 5.9 says the neck or spine injury is assessed as threshold.

What the assessor checks

  • two-of-five clinical-sign rule
  • Table 6.8 verification definitions
  • DRE III for verified radiculopathy
  • EMG and imaging are not solely diagnostic

What does not establish the result by itself

  • radiating pain
  • one sign
  • global weakness
  • MRI or EMG alone

Official sources

Related NSW CTP guides

Free claim check

Get the insurer decision and medical evidence reviewed together

Send the accident date, insurer letter, relevant scans or reports, and any deadline shown. NSW CTP Claim is a specialised service of Stephen Young Lawyers. Legal services are provided by Stephen Young Lawyers.

General information only. This form does not automatically lodge your claim and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. We only act after we accept your matter and a signed costs agreement/retainer is in place. See our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Frequently asked questions

What are the five radiculopathy signs?
Reflex loss/asymmetry, positive sciatic nerve-root tension signs, atrophy/decreased circumference, anatomically localised weakness and reproducible anatomically localised sensory loss.
Do I need all five signs?
No. The Guidelines require two or more, found on examination and interpreted in the correct anatomical distribution.
Is radiating pain one of the five signs?
No. Pain or tingling without objective findings is described as a non-verifiable radicular complaint.
Does EMG prove radiculopathy?
No. Clause 6.142 says electrodiagnostic tests are rarely necessary and the diagnosis should not be made solely from them.
Does radiculopathy automatically mean more than 10% WPI?
No. It informs DRE placement, commonly DRE III, but the region-specific impairment assessment and all applicable rules still control the WPI.