Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP

Hip arthroplasty

Hip replacement and NSW CTP permanent impairment

A total or partial hip replacement does not carry one automatic WPI. Clause 6.101 requires the Table 65 point score for the replacement result, and that score is converted through Table 64.

Hip replacement operative, rehabilitation and walking records reviewed for NSW CTP WPI.
Hip replacement assessment uses a point score for the actual result, not the fact of surgery alone.

Motor accident injury

How can this injury happen?

Car or passenger collision

A severe femoral neck, head or acetabular injury may lead to acute or later replacement.

Motorcycle accident

High-energy landing can cause fracture, avascular necrosis or arthritis requiring arthroplasty.

Pedestrian or cyclist impact

Direct hip and pelvic trauma may ultimately require replacement when reconstruction or joint preservation fails.

Injuries that can occur

  • total hip replacement
  • hemiarthroplasty or revision arthroplasty
  • replacement after fracture or avascular necrosis
  • post-operative dislocation, infection, loosening or leg-length issue

Symptoms and functional problems

  • walking and stair limits
  • difficulty sitting, transfers and putting on shoes
  • pain, instability or recurrent dislocation
  • need for a walking aid or revision surgery

Seek urgent medical assessment

Suspected prosthetic dislocation, infection, acute shortening or inability to weight-bear requires urgent assessment.

Clinical evidence

What findings matter?

The table score needs the replacement result, including pain, function, walking and examination findings. Operative and rehabilitation records explain the context but do not replace the point assessment.

Record or examinationWhat it may establishWhat it cannot prove alone
Operative and implant recordConfirms procedure, indication, components and complications.The operation name does not set the score.
Table 65 clinical assessmentScores the actual hip replacement result, including function and examination items.Exact points require the readable AMA4 table.
X-ray and rehabilitation evidenceShows component position, complications and sustained walking capacity.A satisfactory X-ray does not decide all functional points.

Movement in daily life

How movement affects real activities

Hip replacement function is reflected in walking, transfers, stairs, sitting and shoe care. Table 65 uses a point system rather than simply converting one ROM angle.

Walking distance

Community mobility, shopping and work travel.

Clause 6.102 reads six blocks as 600 metres and three blocks as 300 metres in Table 65.

Transfers and stairs

Rising, entering a vehicle and moving between levels.

Functional evidence should match the Table 65 point items.

Hip examination

Stability and practical movement for dressing and sitting.

The clinical findings form part of the replacement result, not a separate duplicate ROM rating.

Threshold injury is a separate question: replacement is treatment, not a threshold classification. The underlying fracture, cartilage injury or other accident-related pathology determines classification.

Part 6 permanent impairment

How is CTP WPI assessed?

Clause 6.101 directs hip replacement to AMA4 Table 65. The Table 65 points are added and the total is converted to impairment through Table 64; the site does not publish point rows because the supplied AMA4 chapter is unreadable.

Measurement rules that apply

  • Clauses 6.69 and 6.70 require the method that most specifically addresses the lower-limb impairment. Gait should not replace a joint, nerve, fracture or replacement method that can be applied reliably.
  • Clause 6.84 requires active range of motion, a goniometer where clinically indicated and consistent repetitions when reliability is uncertain. Passive movement may inform the examination but does not set the impairment value.
  • Clause 6.85 says only the most severe deficit in one direction or axis from the same lower-limb ROM table is rated. Deficits from separate tables may be combined only as the Guidelines permit.
MethodCTP sourceWhen it is relevantImportant limit
Hip replacement point scoreClause 6.101; AMA4 Table 65The permanent result after hip arthroplasty.All points are added, but exact row values require readable AMA4.
Distance modificationClause 6.102Interprets the walking-distance items in Table 65.Six blocks means 600 m and three blocks means 300 m.
ConversionTable 64 and Table 6.4Converts the replacement result to WPI as directed.Do not add surgery or ROM again for the same result.
  • Assess after the replacement result is permanent or well stabilised.
  • Record aids, walking tolerance and complications accurately.
  • A revision or poor outcome may change the point result but does not create a fixed percentage by label.

What cannot be combined?

  • separate hip ROM rating for the same replacement result
  • gait derangement with the replacement evaluation
  • pain or surgery as additional percentages

What does not establish WPI by itself?

  • implant on X-ray
  • operation date
  • pain score
  • use of a cane without necessity and permanence

Motor accident examples

Fracture treated with total hip replacement

The assessor applies Table 65 to the actual result; the fracture and surgery are not separately stacked for the same hip impairment.

Replacement with revision planned

If the condition is likely to change substantially, permanent assessment may be premature.

Claim file preparation

Evidence checklist

operative report and implant details
Table 65 examination items
measured walking distance and aid use
serial X-rays and complication records
rehabilitation plateau and revision plan
dated GP, hospital and specialist records describing the accident mechanism and first lower-limb findings
weight-bearing status, walking aids, gait and active joint measurements recorded over time
prior imaging and records for the same limb where causation or deduction is in issue
rehabilitation, capacity and work-task evidence showing the practical residual impairment

Assessment source

Hip replacement WPI source

Assessment source: Motor Accident Guidelines v10.1 clauses 6.19-6.21 and 6.101-6.102; AMA4 Tables 65 and 64; Table 6.4 conversion.

Threshold injury: Hip replacement is treatment. Threshold status depends on the underlying accident-related injury.

What the assessor checks

  • Table 65 point system
  • points added
  • distance modification
  • Table 64 conversion

What does not establish the result by itself

  • surgery
  • implant
  • pain
  • walking aid alone

Official sources

Related NSW CTP guides

Free claim check

Review the medical evidence and insurer decision together

Send the accident date, insurer letter, scans or reports and any deadline shown. NSW CTP Claim is a specialised service of Stephen Young Lawyers. Legal services are provided by Stephen Young Lawyers.

General information only. This form does not automatically lodge your claim and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. We only act after we accept your matter and a signed costs agreement/retainer is in place. See our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Frequently asked questions

Does hip replacement equal a fixed WPI?
No. Clause 6.101 requires Table 65 point scoring for the actual replacement result.
Are the Table 65 points added?
Yes. Clause 6.101 distinguishes Table 65, where points are added, from Table 66 for the knee.
How are walking blocks interpreted?
Clause 6.102 says six blocks means 600 metres and three blocks means 300 metres.
Can ROM be added?
Not when it rates the same replacement result. The combination rules prevent duplicate assessment.
When should assessment occur?
When the replacement outcome is permanent or sufficiently stable and unlikely to change substantially.