Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP

Lower limb assessment method

Gait derangement after a motor accident

A limp is not an extra impairment percentage. Under clause 6.78, gait derangement is a last-resort method used only when another lower-limb method cannot be applied satisfactorily, and it cannot be combined with any other lower-limb evaluation.

Walking pattern, aid use, joint findings and rehabilitation evidence reviewed for NSW CTP.
Gait derangement is a last-resort method and cannot be added to another lower-limb evaluation.

Motor accident injury

How can this injury happen?

Car or passenger collision

Pelvic, hip, knee, ankle, foot or nerve injury may alter walking after a collision.

Motorcycle accident

Fracture, joint injury or nerve damage after a motorcycle fall can produce persistent gait change.

Pedestrian or cyclist impact

Multiple lower-limb injuries after pedestrian impact may prevent a single joint method from addressing the whole pattern.

Injuries that can occur

  • antalgic gait from structural lower-limb injury
  • Trendelenburg-type or abductor-related gait
  • stiff-knee, foot-drop or shortened-limb gait
  • multi-joint impairment not satisfactorily assessed by another valid method

Symptoms and functional problems

  • limp and reduced walking distance
  • need for a cane, crutch or brace
  • difficulty stairs, slopes or uneven ground
  • fatigue and slower community mobility

Seek urgent medical assessment

Sudden inability to walk, new foot drop, calf swelling, severe pain or neurological change requires prompt medical assessment.

Clinical evidence

What findings matter?

The assessor must first identify the cause of the altered gait and explain why a more specific joint, fracture, nerve, replacement, length or arthritis method cannot be applied satisfactorily. Aid use must be medically necessary and permanent.

Record or examinationWhat it may establishWhat it cannot prove alone
Observed gait examinationRecords pattern, consistency, distance, transfers and aid use.A brief observed limp does not establish permanence or a Table 36 category.
Joint, nerve and length examinationTests whether a more specific method can assess the impairment.Gait cannot be chosen merely because it produces a convenient result.
Rehabilitation and aid prescriptionSupports long-term walking limits and whether an aid is necessary.Possessing or occasionally using an aid is insufficient.

Movement in daily life

How movement affects real activities

Gait is the integrated result of hip, knee, ankle, foot, nerve and balance function. The method is reserved for cases where that overall pattern cannot be satisfactorily represented by a more specific method.

Stance phase

Accepting body weight and maintaining pelvic stability.

The cause must be linked to permanent accident-related impairment.

Swing phase

Clearing the foot and advancing the limb.

Joint movement or a named nerve method is preferred where it specifically explains the deficit.

Walking aid use

Safe support for community mobility.

Clause 6.79 requires the aid to be necessary and permanent for the relevant Table 36 item.

Threshold injury is a separate question: an altered gait is a consequence, not a threshold diagnosis. Threshold status depends on the underlying accident-related injury.

Part 6 permanent impairment

How is CTP WPI assessed?

Clauses 6.78 to 6.80 modify AMA4 Table 36. Gait is a last resort, reasons must be given, it cannot be combined with another lower-limb evaluation, any relied-on walking aid must be necessary and permanent, and Table 36 item b (Trendelenburg sign) is deleted.

Measurement rules that apply

  • Clauses 6.69 and 6.70 require the method that most specifically addresses the lower-limb impairment. Gait should not replace a joint, nerve, fracture or replacement method that can be applied reliably.
  • Clause 6.84 requires active range of motion, a goniometer where clinically indicated and consistent repetitions when reliability is uncertain. Passive movement may inform the examination but does not set the impairment value.
  • Clause 6.85 says only the most severe deficit in one direction or axis from the same lower-limb ROM table is rated. Deficits from separate tables may be combined only as the Guidelines permit.
MethodCTP sourceWhen it is relevantImportant limit
Gait derangementClause 6.78; AMA4 Table 36Only where another lower-limb method cannot be applied satisfactorily.Cannot combine with any other lower-limb evaluation.
Walking-aid itemClause 6.79; Table 36Where the aid is genuinely medically necessary and permanent.Occasional or precautionary use is not enough.
Deleted itemClause 6.80Table 36 item b is not available.Trendelenburg sign cannot be rated under the deleted row.
  • Explain why every more specific method is unsuitable.
  • Record a consistent permanent gait pattern.
  • Do not combine the gait result with another lower-limb value.

What cannot be combined?

  • gait with ROM, arthritis or diagnosis-based estimate
  • gait with replacement, leg-length or nerve impairment
  • gait with atrophy, strength or CRPS

What does not establish WPI by itself?

  • limp observed once
  • pain while walking
  • self-purchased cane
  • gait change without diagnosed cause

Motor accident examples

Knee injury measurable under Table 41

Gait should not be used because a more specific valid knee ROM method can address the impairment.

Complex multi-joint injury with permanent aid

Gait may be considered only if the assessor explains why no other method works satisfactorily and confirms the aid is necessary and permanent.

Claim file preparation

Evidence checklist

serial gait descriptions and walking-distance records
joint, nerve, strength, length and balance examination
rehabilitation and treating-specialist explanation
walking-aid prescription and long-term necessity
reasoned explanation why specific lower-limb methods are unsuitable
dated GP, hospital and specialist records describing the accident mechanism and first lower-limb findings
weight-bearing status, walking aids, gait and active joint measurements recorded over time
prior imaging and records for the same limb where causation or deduction is in issue
rehabilitation, capacity and work-task evidence showing the practical residual impairment

Assessment source

Gait derangement WPI source

Assessment source: Motor Accident Guidelines v10.1 clauses 6.78-6.80; modified AMA4 Table 36.

Threshold injury: Gait is a WPI assessment method, not a threshold injury diagnosis; classification follows the underlying injury.

What the assessor checks

  • last-resort rule
  • no combination
  • necessary permanent aid
  • Table 36 item b deleted

What does not establish the result by itself

  • limp
  • pain
  • aid possession
  • undiagnosed cause

Official sources

Related NSW CTP guides

Free claim check

Review the medical evidence and insurer decision together

Send the accident date, insurer letter, scans or reports and any deadline shown. NSW CTP Claim is a specialised service of Stephen Young Lawyers. Legal services are provided by Stephen Young Lawyers.

General information only. This form does not automatically lodge your claim and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. We only act after we accept your matter and a signed costs agreement/retainer is in place. See our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Frequently asked questions

Is every limp assessable under Table 36?
No. Gait is a last resort and requires a permanent accident-related impairment.
Can gait be added to knee or ankle WPI?
No. Clause 6.78 prohibits combining gait with another lower-limb evaluation.
Must a walking aid be permanent?
Yes for a Table 36 item that depends on aid use; clause 6.79 requires it to be necessary and permanent.
Is Trendelenburg sign rated?
Not under Table 36 item b, because clause 6.80 deletes that item.
Why is another method preferred?
A joint, fracture, nerve or replacement method usually identifies the actual impairment more specifically.