Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP

Front-of-knee injury

Patella and patellofemoral injury after a motor accident

A patella injury may involve fracture, dislocation, tendon or cartilage damage. Anterior knee pain alone is not a WPI method; the assessment must identify movement loss, objective instability, fracture residual or properly measured cartilage loss.

Patella imaging, tracking, active knee movement and stair function evidence for NSW CTP.
Patellofemoral assessment connects fracture, tracking and cartilage findings with the most specific valid method.

Motor accident injury

How can this injury happen?

Car or passenger collision

Direct dashboard impact can fracture the patella or damage patellofemoral cartilage.

Motorcycle accident

A fall onto the knee or twisting with the patella displaced can cause fracture or dislocation.

Pedestrian or cyclist impact

Bumper impact and ground contact can injure the patella, extensor mechanism and cartilage.

Injuries that can occur

  • patella fracture or malunion
  • patella dislocation or recurrent instability
  • patellofemoral cartilage injury
  • patellar or quadriceps tendon rupture
  • post-traumatic arthritis or stiffness

Symptoms and functional problems

  • anterior knee pain on stairs or rising
  • instability or apprehension
  • reduced flexion, extension or kneeling tolerance
  • crepitus, swelling or extensor lag

Seek urgent medical assessment

Inability to straight-leg raise, deformity or suspected displaced fracture requires urgent assessment.

Clinical evidence

What findings matter?

The report should identify fracture, tracking, stability, extensor continuity and cartilage evidence. Crepitus and pain need a valid method rather than a standalone percentage.

Record or examinationWhat it may establishWhat it cannot prove alone
X-ray, skyline view or CTShows fracture, alignment, joint congruity and patellofemoral cartilage interval.Ordinary imaging without defined position may not support Table 62.
Tracking and stability examinationRecords apprehension, recurrent dislocation and extensor mechanism.Apprehension alone is not a table row.
Active knee ROMMeasures permanent flexion and extension loss.Do not duplicate a diagnosis-based consequence.

Movement in daily life

How movement affects real activities

Patellofemoral problems often affect knee flexion under load for stairs, squatting and rising, while extension is essential for a stable step and straight-leg control.

Knee flexion

Stairs, squatting, kneeling and sitting.

Table 41 applies when active movement loss is the specific impairment.

Knee extension

Standing, walking and straight-leg control.

Extensor lag must be distinguished from pain-limited effort.

Patella tracking and stability

Controlled bending and direction change.

A Table 64 diagnosis row is used only if exact criteria and footnotes apply.

Threshold injury is a separate question: patella fracture or verified cartilage/tendon/ligament rupture may be non-threshold. Patellofemoral pain without rupture may be threshold.

Part 6 permanent impairment

How is CTP WPI assessed?

Potential methods include Table 41 ROM, Table 62 arthritis/cartilage interval and Table 64 diagnosis-based estimates. The most specific valid method is selected.

Measurement rules that apply

  • Clauses 6.69 and 6.70 require the method that most specifically addresses the lower-limb impairment. Gait should not replace a joint, nerve, fracture or replacement method that can be applied reliably.
  • Clause 6.84 requires active range of motion, a goniometer where clinically indicated and consistent repetitions when reliability is uncertain. Passive movement may inform the examination but does not set the impairment value.
  • Clause 6.85 says only the most severe deficit in one direction or axis from the same lower-limb ROM table is rated. Deficits from separate tables may be combined only as the Guidelines permit.
MethodCTP sourceWhen it is relevantImportant limit
Knee ROMClauses 6.84-6.85; Table 41Permanent active flexion or extension loss.Do not add multiple deficits from the same table.
Arthritis/cartilage intervalClauses 6.88-6.92; Table 62Properly positioned radiographs showing cartilage thickness.Pain, crepitus and osteophytes do not set the interval.
Diagnosis-based estimateClauses 6.94-6.97; Table 64A listed fracture or instability residual.Exact row values require readable AMA4.
  • Distinguish fracture, instability and cartilage methods.
  • Document residual signs at examination.
  • Convert lower-extremity impairment through Table 6.4.

What cannot be combined?

  • arthritis with ROM, gait, atrophy or strength
  • gait with any other lower-limb evaluation
  • ROM and diagnosis method for the same patellofemoral consequence

What does not establish WPI by itself?

  • anterior knee pain
  • crepitus
  • apprehension alone
  • arthroscopy or fixation

Motor accident examples

Dashboard patella fracture

The fracture history is important, but WPI depends on the applicable residual diagnosis, movement or arthritis method.

Recurrent patella instability

Current objective instability and exact Table 64 criteria are needed; subjective apprehension is insufficient.

Claim file preparation

Evidence checklist

patella X-ray/CT including appropriate views
active knee flexion and extension
tracking, apprehension and extensor examination
cartilage interval radiology where relied on
operative and rehabilitation records
dated GP, hospital and specialist records describing the accident mechanism and first lower-limb findings
weight-bearing status, walking aids, gait and active joint measurements recorded over time
prior imaging and records for the same limb where causation or deduction is in issue
rehabilitation, capacity and work-task evidence showing the practical residual impairment

Assessment source

Patella WPI source

Assessment source: Motor Accident Guidelines v10.1 clauses 6.68-6.75 and 6.84-6.97; AMA4 Tables 41, 62, 64 and Table 6.4.

Threshold injury: Fracture or verified cartilage/tendon/ligament rupture may be non-threshold; pain syndrome without rupture may remain threshold.

What the assessor checks

  • ROM
  • arthritis radiology
  • diagnosis-based estimate
  • combination rules

What does not establish the result by itself

  • pain
  • crepitus
  • apprehension
  • surgery

Official sources

Related NSW CTP guides

Free claim check

Review the medical evidence and insurer decision together

Send the accident date, insurer letter, scans or reports and any deadline shown. NSW CTP Claim is a specialised service of Stephen Young Lawyers. Legal services are provided by Stephen Young Lawyers.

General information only. This form does not automatically lodge your claim and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. We only act after we accept your matter and a signed costs agreement/retainer is in place. See our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Frequently asked questions

Does patella fracture have fixed WPI?
No. The permanent residual and most specific valid method determine WPI.
Can crepitus be rated?
Not by itself. A permitted diagnosis, movement or arthritis method is required.
How is cartilage loss measured?
Table 62 uses the articular cartilage interval on properly positioned radiographs.
Can ROM and arthritis be combined?
No when arthritis is the assessment basis, because clause 6.91 prohibits combining it with ROM.
Does patella surgery set the percentage?
No. Surgery is evidence; the stable residual impairment controls.