Skip to main content
NSW CTP Claim
NSW CTP

Complex regional pain syndrome

Upper-limb CRPS after a motor accident

CTP does not assess CRPS using the old AMA4 causalgia or reflex sympathetic dystrophy section. The diagnosis requires at least eight of 11 Part 6 criteria, then type I or type II is assessed through the specific joint, sensory and nerve method.

Upper-limb CRPS clinical signs, movement and rehabilitation records for NSW CTP.
CRPS requires the Part 6 diagnostic criteria and a structured impairment calculation, not severe pain alone.

Motor accident injury

How can this injury happen?

Car or passenger collision

Fracture, crush, surgery or nerve injury after a collision may precede upper-limb CRPS.

Motorcycle accident

A wrist, hand or shoulder fracture from a fall may develop disproportionate regional symptoms and objective trophic signs.

Pedestrian or cyclist impact

Crush, fracture or laceration can be followed by persistent autonomic, sensory and movement change.

Injuries that can occur

  • CRPS type I without identified nerve lesion
  • CRPS type II with identified nerve injury
  • associated fracture, tendon or joint injury
  • secondary stiffness, trophic change and disuse

Symptoms and functional problems

  • disproportionate regional pain and allodynia
  • colour, temperature, sweating or oedema change
  • joint stiffness and reduced passive motion
  • skin, nail, hair, soft tissue or bone trophic change

Clinical evidence

What findings matter?

Clause 6.62 requires at least eight of 11 specified criteria. The file should record which criteria are present, on what dates and by whom, rather than rely on a general CRPS label.

Record or examinationWhat it may establishWhat it cannot prove alone
Repeated clinical examinationRecords skin colour, temperature, oedema, moisture, texture, atrophy, joint stiffness, nail and hair changes.Severe pain or allodynia alone does not meet eight criteria.
X-ray or bone scanMay satisfy the trophic-bone or CRPS bone-scan criteria.A normal result does not decide every clinical criterion, and an abnormal result alone is insufficient.
Nerve examination/EMGHelps distinguish type II with a nerve lesion from type I.The diagnosis and full impairment method still require the Part 6 criteria.

Movement in daily life

How movement affects real activities

CRPS may affect several joints in the hand, wrist, elbow or shoulder. Each affected joint is assessed for motion, while sensory and motor components follow the type I or II rules.

Affected joint motion

Reaching, gripping, dressing and hand use across all involved joints.

Clause 6.63 or 6.64 requires joint-by-joint loss of motion.

Sensory deficit and pain

Tolerance of touch, clothing, temperature and object handling.

Type I uses Table 11a without a nerve multiplier; type II uses the section 3.1k nerve method.

Motor deficit in type II

Named nerve control of the hand and arm.

Table 12a applies only where type II includes an injured nerve.

Threshold injury is a separate question: CRPS symptoms do not by themselves answer threshold classification. The underlying fracture, nerve injury, rupture or other accident-related pathology must be identified separately.

Part 6 permanent impairment

How is CTP WPI assessed?

Clauses 6.61-6.64 replace the old AMA4 CRPS section. Type I combines affected-joint movement with a Table 11a sensory/pain value. Type II also assesses the injured nerve motor deficit under Table 12a.

Measurement rules that apply

  • Clause 6.50 requires active, not passive, range of motion for the impairment calculation. A goniometer should be used where clinically indicated, and unreliable movement should be repeated consistently before it is accepted.
  • Clauses 6.51 and 6.52 permit a contralateral baseline only where the uninjured joint is a fair estimate of pre-accident mobility. The total upper-extremity impairment for each comparable joint is subtracted before conversion to WPI.
  • Clause 6.67 prohibits upper-limb strength evaluation and AMA4 Table 34. A genuine peripheral nerve or muscle-bulk injury must use another permitted method without double counting.
MethodCTP sourceWhen it is relevantImportant limit
Diagnostic criteriaClause 6.62At least eight of 11 specified objective criteria.Pain alone cannot establish the diagnosis.
CRPS type IClause 6.63; Table 11a and joint ROMCRPS without an identified nerve lesion.No nerve multiplier is used.
CRPS type IIClause 6.64; Tables 11a and 12aCRPS with a verified injured nerve.Joint, sensory and motor values are combined as directed.
  • The old causalgia/RSD section must not be used.
  • Use the Combined Values chart, then Table 3 to convert UEI to WPI.
  • Do not add a separate Chapter 15 pain value.

What cannot be combined?

  • CRPS with another value for the same joint, sensory or motor consequence
  • a peripheral nerve value again after it is included in type II CRPS
  • old AMA4 causalgia/RSD method

What does not establish WPI by itself?

  • severe pain
  • allodynia alone
  • a diagnosis label without eight criteria
  • one photograph or one quiet examination

Motor accident examples

Wrist fracture followed by type I CRPS

The file must document at least eight criteria, then apply joint motion and the type I sensory/pain method without a nerve multiplier.

Nerve laceration with type II CRPS

Type II requires the specific injured nerve motor and sensory method plus affected-joint motion, without duplicate nerve rating.

Claim file preparation

Evidence checklist

criterion-by-criterion CRPS examination records
serial photographs with dates as supporting evidence
X-ray or bone scan where performed
pain/rehabilitation specialist diagnosis
nerve findings for type II
joint-by-joint movement measurements
dated GP, emergency and specialist notes linking onset to the motor accident
active movement measurements and the instrument used where ROM is relied on
prior records for the same joint or limb where causation or deduction is disputed
treatment, rehabilitation and work-function records showing the current stable impairment

Practical next steps

What should you do next with a upper-limb crps claim?

Start with the insurer's most recent written decision and identify what is actually disputed: treatment, weekly payments or work capacity, threshold injury, permanent impairment, causation, or damages. These are separate questions and may require different evidence and review procedures. Record the date of the decision and every review deadline shown before gathering further material.

  1. 01

    Preserve the claim and the decision under review

    Keep the claim number, accident date, insurer letter, certificate of fitness and any internal review or Personal Injury Commission correspondence together. Do not assume that a treatment approval or payment of statutory benefits decides fault, damages eligibility or WPI.

  2. 02

    Obtain evidence that answers the disputed issue

    For this injury, the useful starting material includes criterion-by-criterion CRPS examination records and serial photographs with dates as supporting evidence. Clinical testing may include Repeated clinical examination and X-ray or bone scan. Ask the treating practitioner to record the diagnosis, accident causation, objective findings, treatment response and current functional limits rather than symptoms alone.

  3. 03

    Use the correct review process

    Compare the insurer's reasons with the records it relied on. A threshold-injury decision, treatment refusal, weekly-payment decision and WPI assessment do not all follow the same review process. The decision letter should identify available internal review or dispute steps and the applicable deadline.

If the decision, medical material or deadline is unclear, send the key documents for a focused review before lodging a broad objection. See the CTP disputes guide or contact NSW CTP Claim. Advice depends on the facts, evidence and current law; a review cannot guarantee a claim outcome.

Assessment source

Upper-limb CRPS WPI source

Assessment source: Motor Accident Guidelines v10.1 clauses 6.61-6.64; AMA4 Table 11a, Table 12a, joint ROM figures, Table 3 and Combined Values chart. The old causalgia/RSD section must not be used.

Threshold injury: CRPS does not decide threshold status by label alone; the underlying accident-related injury must be identified.

What the assessor checks

  • 8 of 11 diagnostic criteria
  • type I method
  • type II method
  • old method prohibition

What does not establish the result by itself

  • pain
  • allodynia
  • diagnosis label
  • single photograph

Official sources

Related NSW CTP guides

Free claim check

Review the medical evidence and insurer decision together

Send the accident date, insurer letter, scans or reports and any deadline shown. NSW CTP Claim is a specialised service of Stephen Young Lawyers. Legal services are provided by Stephen Young Lawyers.

General information only. This form does not automatically lodge your claim and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. We only act after we accept your matter and a signed costs agreement/retainer is in place. See our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Frequently asked questions

How many CRPS criteria are required?
Clause 6.62 requires at least eight of the 11 listed criteria.
Can severe pain alone establish CRPS?
No. The specified objective criteria are required.
What is the difference between type I and type II?
Type II includes an identified nerve injury and therefore includes the specific motor and sensory nerve method.
Is the old RSD method used?
No. Clause 6.61 says the old causalgia and reflex sympathetic dystrophy section must not be used.
Can pain be added again under AMA4 Chapter 15?
No. Clause 6.38 prohibits a separate Chapter 15 pain allowance.